Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 3:09 pm
by mj43
TwoStroke Institute wrote:...The fully open and full closed runs is not the way to do it either....
As the KR power valve is effectively a switch what is the point of testing in between open or closed?

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:35 pm
by TwoStroke Institute
I never said to test in between open and closed, and doing full open and full closed tests does not provide the correct effective open/close point.


Jan you will still split timing on a parallel twin.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:15 pm
by mj43
So how do you recommend testing a KR power valve system if you are not meant to test in between open and closed but open and closed is wrong?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:36 am
by JanBros
TwoStroke Institute wrote: Jan you will still split timing on a parallel twin.
what do you mean with "split" ?

a paralel twin with matching cylindres/tuning surely requires the same timing for both no ?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:41 pm
by TwoStroke Institute
No requires split timing between the cylinders, parallel, V or inline tandem timing still gets split. Split I mean that cylinders run different ignition curves.

MJ I don't know how to make it any simpler, than doing a full open then a full closed runs and comparing the 2, is not the best way to arrive at the correct effective open/close point (depending on your terminology).

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:59 am
by TwoStroke Institute
Have you got the Ignitech fired up yet? :lol:

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:32 am
by Luders
Not yet and I probably won't get round to looking at it for another month. Work on the bike has been slow, but I will be picking up the pace on the rebuild very soon.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:30 pm
by Luders
Got the bike fired up today with the new ignition.

Need to work on the configuration a bit, but all seems well so far.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 pm
by TwoStroke Institute
Sounds exciting